I whole-heartedly disagree.
The individual is still strong at his or her core. Any weaknesses to the individual can be attributed to overreaching interference from the government.
Why would an individual keep trying to find a job or buy food, when he or she can be on food stamps and unemployment for over a year?
Why would a couple, or even a single parent, be more proactive in using birth control, if they receive more government assistance with each kid? Parental irresponsibility is only encouraged further through public assistant programs to provide food, diapers and other basic needs. No, I don’t want kids to live in filth or starve, nor do I want them aborted, what I want is for parents to be responsible lovers and if they aren’t, I want them to be parents. Is that too much to ask?
Apparently it is to some people. One of the dangers of becoming too dependent on the government is surfacing in the gun debate. People were not guaranteed the right to bear arms just to go hunting, it is for protection.
I am in no way disparaging anyone in law enforcement, but the fact is they cannot be everywhere to protect everyone all of the time. You might have to do something for yourself, but people have forgotten that because they’ve been brainwashed to believe that government will be the sole protector of everyone.
It’s just not true. What is even more dangerous is that the more reliant on government you are, the less freedom you have. It is awfully easy for a government that gives you everything, to be just as quick to take everything away. Maybe that will happen, maybe it won’t, but it’s best not to leave yourself vulnerable to that possibility.